منابع مشابه
The Habermas-gadamer Debate
ly negated on the basis of a.false c.laim t.. o superiority. ~~ciallife-; the-symmetrkaJ..rc1atioll-betweenpartners in a game is a more apnnooer1 than that ofdoctor~patient.Everyone IS on relatively equal terms in the gallle..in that there are no privileged knowers. There is, however~anlmder lying consensus which expresses the ontological primacy of tradition and which is the condition of all ...
متن کاملAssaying Vandevelde’s Approach to Gadamer
The purpose of this paper is to look at four important aspects of Vandevelde’s criticisms of Gadamer. First is his position on Gadamer’s claim that his hermeneutics is a “philosophical hermeneutics” and not a methodology. Second is Vandevelde’s view of interpretation as necessarily going back to the author’s intention, and the status of the “mental state” of the author. Is it relevant to int...
متن کاملHermeneutics and historical consciousness: An appraisal of the contribution of Hans-Georg Gadamer
Ab stract In this in tro duc tory ar ti cle to the vol ume of the South Af ri can Jour nal of Phi loso phy in trib ute of HansGeorg Gada mer, the author, first, makes a few re marks about the na ture of her me neu tics and Gadamer's views on the uni ver sal ity of the her me neu ti cal ex pe ri ence. This uni ver sal ity is, in par ticu lar, ex plained from the per spec tive of the “lin guis ti...
متن کاملBenzylisoquinoline alkaloids from the papaveraceae: the heritage of Johannes Gadamer (1867-1928).
The substance archive of the laboratory of Johannes Gadamer (1867-1928), Marburg, Germany, was analyzed thoroughly with modern instrumental methods, with the samples purified when necessary, and the authenticity of the samples confirmed by historical and analytical evidence. Eight formerly unknown alkaloids of the benzylisoquinoline type were identified in the archive originally isolated from C...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Revista Opinião Filosófica
سال: 2017
ISSN: 2178-1176
DOI: 10.36592/opiniaofilosofica.v8i1.742